Filed in archive
Technology
by tj on March 22, 2005
We are here 'Software as a Service' event in Santa Clara, CA and enjoy the first sessions here.
Practical Considerations
On the panel:
- Tim Chou, Oracle on Demand- Halsey Minor, CEO, Grand Central- Zach Nelson, CEO, Netsuite- Steve Singh, CEO, ConcurHighlights:
- Panelists discuss the need and evolvement of Software as a Service (SaaS) model
- The question is often cited is SaaS just another hype like 'b2b'. 'b2c','Push Model'. Panelists agree that SaaS must be more deliver a better product.
- Interesting notion - pricing and delivery should be separated in the analysis of SaaS.
- Frequency of deals has gone up for most sales reps in the industry before SaaS (4) with SaaS (15).
- Customers have more control in SaaS - customers can cancel a contract every day (at least ideally) while in an up-front model an investment is lost.
- SaaS supports specialization - best of breed software is accessible for them
- Steve confirms that revenues per customer on an ASP model are higher than in upfront license only customers (might be true for a startup but certainly not for the bigger vendors) - he even says SMBs are more profitable than MNCs.
- Halsey makes sure that one of the values in SaaS is the interopability between different applications via web services.
Conclusion: Quite a nice warm-up for this day - one of the problems of the industry as it is hardly a well defined industry as it serves to very different customers with very different problem solutions. But sure SaaS is better than buying software in most circumstances.
Practical Considerations
On the panel:
- Tim Chou, Oracle on Demand- Halsey Minor, CEO, Grand Central- Zach Nelson, CEO, Netsuite- Steve Singh, CEO, ConcurHighlights:
- Panelists discuss the need and evolvement of Software as a Service (SaaS) model
- The question is often cited is SaaS just another hype like 'b2b'. 'b2c','Push Model'. Panelists agree that SaaS must be more deliver a better product.
- Interesting notion - pricing and delivery should be separated in the analysis of SaaS.
- Frequency of deals has gone up for most sales reps in the industry before SaaS (4) with SaaS (15).
- Customers have more control in SaaS - customers can cancel a contract every day (at least ideally) while in an up-front model an investment is lost.
- SaaS supports specialization - best of breed software is accessible for them
- Steve confirms that revenues per customer on an ASP model are higher than in upfront license only customers (might be true for a startup but certainly not for the bigger vendors) - he even says SMBs are more profitable than MNCs.
- Halsey makes sure that one of the values in SaaS is the interopability between different applications via web services.
Conclusion: Quite a nice warm-up for this day - one of the problems of the industry as it is hardly a well defined industry as it serves to very different customers with very different problem solutions. But sure SaaS is better than buying software in most circumstances.
Permalink: Software as a Service - Part I
Trackback: http://publish.creative-weblogging.com/publish/mt-tb.pl/5485
Mr Wong
Vote for Software as a Service - Part I:
|
Rating: 8.00 out of 1 vote(s) cast.
|
Subscribe
Use the search to look for other interesting posts
| RSS | See all blog subscribe options |
|
What is RSS? | |
| Yahoo! |
|
| Addthis |
|
| Bloglines |
|
| Newsletter | |
| Follow us on Twitter! |
















