Filed in archive
Technology
by tj on September 24, 2003
The NYT has another good one - about comparison shopping. I have always been quite reluctant with the revenue potential of such portals. But it seems they are going to spring up everywhere. shopping.com now starts with products like apparel, which are much more difficult to compare. The only revenue channel is sales provision and some plain banners. On the cost side you have the traffic, software development and more importantly content management. It might be true that Froogle.com has some mysterious low cost spider technology, but missing this, how can you make such a site valuable for customers and profitable at the same time?
Permalink: comparison shopping
Tags:
technology
comparison
entrepreneurship
shopping
2003
comparison+shopping
venture+capital
germany+sam
Trackback: http://publish.creative-weblogging.com/publish/mt-tb.pl/357
Mr Wong
Vote for comparison shopping:
|
Rating: 8.00 out of 3 vote(s) cast.
|
Response from:
Stefan Smalla
(09/25/03 6:50pm)
Reviews might help. But I am biased ... :-)
Response from:
Andrew
(04/17/06 12:02am)
I just would like to point out that Froogle.com data are all submitted using data feeds from merchants, not crawled.
Andrew
http://www.PriceComparison.com
Andrew
http://www.PriceComparison.com
Subscribe
Use the search to look for other interesting posts
| RSS | See all blog subscribe options |
|
What is RSS? | |
| Yahoo! |
|
| Addthis |
|
| Bloglines |
|
| Newsletter | |
| Follow us on Twitter! |















