Filed in archive
Global Economy
by tj on April 10, 2005
Welcome to the latest edition of the 'Carnival of the Capitalists' I hope you enjoy the following hand selected TOP 20 entries below. They represent 20 great and original blog pieces from all over the blogosphere.
I actually think that shortening the endless scrolling of the latest Carnivals actually helps the event to get going as it grows to a wider popularity. Before I saw the first Carnival I always thought it must be like this before I heard every submission will be published. However I'm happy to see your comments if this is a good idea and if it should be adopted in future.
In all this weeks Carnival had more than 45 contributions. The selection of 20 best blogs is my service its readers. It is however not meant to be an offence against the left out bloggers. There are many more Carnivals in future to explore!
Next weeks Carnival will be at the excellent Gongol.com.
I actually think that shortening the endless scrolling of the latest Carnivals actually helps the event to get going as it grows to a wider popularity. Before I saw the first Carnival I always thought it must be like this before I heard every submission will be published. However I'm happy to see your comments if this is a good idea and if it should be adopted in future.
- Will Franklin writes about a laboratory for Social Security reform.
"A look at Galveston's successes with market-based Social Security reform. While Galveston's plan is not the same as the President's, it shows that reform is a worthwhile endeavor."
- Anita argues why giving consumers power of RFID could change the game.
"Some consumers are worried about privacy in a world where goods have radio frequency tags that can transmit information about those goods (think robbers scanning your home from the street to see what is inside). The RFID Weblog examines a revolutionary proposal suggesting that consumers be given control over who can have access to the RFID tag information"
- Peter has a very good analysis on what micro-content means for events.
"API's, MicroContent, Structured Blogging. What does all this mean for the event business? This post discusses the opportunities for aggregating different types of content [using those technologies] into one place, to bring the community together online before, during and after an event so that they can contribute to the planning, marketing, and creation of the memory of an event."
- Martin dissects the latest very good piece from the Economist about consumer power.
"Find thoughts on the powerful consumer and the "long tail of the web."
- Barry has enticing new arguments on the old debate about P2P.
"Its Illegal. That's the phrase the Recording Industry have been chanting nonstop for the past 5 years. It has been the mantra of the big labels and studios ever since Napster winked into existence. But a subtle shift is already underway."
- David has found great ways to get rid of paying tax - see what is his secret.
"Two years ago, David Gross decided to protest the war in Iraq by stopping payment on it - resisting his federal income tax. He's been doing this legally and by-the-book by reducing his income below the tax line. What he's discovered along the way is that this isn't very difficult and has unexpected rewards. In this second Annual Report, he charts his incomes and outgoes and sets goals for the year ahead."
- Rob reflects on how open a company can be with its strategy in order to succeed.
- Meanwhile Paul analyzes the recent turbulences in Zimbabwe's economy.
"I excerpt a Tech Central Station article on Zimbabwe's economic problems to discuss Hernando De Soto's concept of 'dead capital' and the importance of property rights in lifting the third world out of poverty."
- Rosa reviews a good new book 'Why we buy'.
"This month Talking Story is encouraging other bloggers to join in on our meme on "The Art of the Sale." In this post, Rosa has written her take on "Why We Buy" and what the seller's goal should be."
- Tim has great new ideas about how to reduce Global Warming
- Brian has an excellent piece comparing the worlds TOP 20 economies by numbers
- Warren has the latest update about the 'evilness' of Walmart.
"A discussion of the pros and cons of the arguments against Walmart - the left's new Great Satan - with a side trip into a description of the unsung economic miracle of the 20th century - the employment of 40,000,000 women entering the economy in the 70's, 80's and 90's."
- Ezra reviews a NYT article on why Chinas place a the worlds factory might change soon.
- Steve has a great overview on why universal healthcare might not be such a great idea.
- Russell looks at the Guardians newest citizen reporter project.
- David looks at the numbers of one of the most intriguing startups - XM.
- Jeff analyzes the new bankruptcy law.
"Some argue that the new law restricting bankruptcies will be bad for entrepreneurs. I argue that our culture's view on bankruptcy is a reflection of a further drift toward a socialistic society where everyone is protected from their own mistakes or stupidity."
- Jeff gives more arguments to the often found notion that efforts to eradicate poverty are often misguided.
- Ashish muses about how harmful the trade Deficit could be.
- Finally Anita once again who sheds light on the "On-and-off-entrepreneur".
In all this weeks Carnival had more than 45 contributions. The selection of 20 best blogs is my service its readers. It is however not meant to be an offence against the left out bloggers. There are many more Carnivals in future to explore!
Next weeks Carnival will be at the excellent Gongol.com.
Trackback: http://publish.creative-weblogging.com/publish/mt-tb.pl/5798
Mr Wong
Vote for Carnival of the Capitalists - Edition 04-10-05:
|
Rating: 7.33 out of 3 vote(s) cast.
|
Response from:
Gordon Smith
(04/11/05 6:27am)
Response from:
Gordon Smith
(04/11/05 6:36am)
Ok, your comments don't take html, which left my "here" just hanging. So I linked my entry on my name.
Response from:
Paul
(04/11/05 6:40am)
While I am glad to see my post included, I do not think it is a good idea to exclude any submissions unless they are well outside the C of C theme. I believe Gongol once persuasively outlined the reasons for this. (Sorry I can't look up the link cause his site is firewalled from work). Anyway, in the spirit of capitalism, I would much rather have the choice to either follow a link or not. Of course, your blog, your rules.
Response from:
Martin Lindeskog
(04/11/05 8:54am)
Paul,
Here is the link:
http://www.gongol.com/opinion/2004/dontexcludecontributors/
Here is the link:
http://www.gongol.com/opinion/2004/dontexcludecontributors/
Response from:
Mad Anthony
(04/11/05 10:29am)
As one of those submitters not included, I'm not thrilled about this system. The quality of posts, and the things people find interesting, vary based from person to person.
It can be hard for smaller bloggers (like myself) to get attention and readers, and COTC is a way I've gotten them in the past. By making it harder to get in, it makes it harder for me to get people to read my blog - making me worse off, but also making any readers who might want to read what I have to say worse off.
I think what some other COTC posters have done - posted their favorites at the top, and then the rest - is a good compromise.
It can be hard for smaller bloggers (like myself) to get attention and readers, and COTC is a way I've gotten them in the past. By making it harder to get in, it makes it harder for me to get people to read my blog - making me worse off, but also making any readers who might want to read what I have to say worse off.
I think what some other COTC posters have done - posted their favorites at the top, and then the rest - is a good compromise.
Response from:
Paul
(04/11/05 4:53pm)
I agree with Mad Anthony that the lesser known bloggers won't get any visibility by choosing who gets in.
Not that there's anything wrong with the blogs you've chosen, but I already go to half of them anyway.
The idea behind a carny, at least as far as I knew, was to get exposure to different bloggers that you might never see.
Just my .02
Not that there's anything wrong with the blogs you've chosen, but I already go to half of them anyway.
The idea behind a carny, at least as far as I knew, was to get exposure to different bloggers that you might never see.
Just my .02
Response from:
Russell Buckley
(04/12/05 7:25am)
As a recent host and as a blogger who made the cut this week :-) I can still see both sides of the argument.
I like having a quality threshold. But I disagree that it discriminates against less well known bloggers. It surely discriminates against bloggers who (in the opinion of the host) are less *good* that week, not less well known.
Sorry, Mad Anthony, nothing personal. And if I had run this system, you would have got in that week.
But I can also see the argument for a well systemised blog, making stuff of interest easy to find. And maybe with the host highlighting his/her personal favourites at the top, for that serendipity that makes the Carnival so great.
Balanced against this though is the huge amount of extra work a host would need to invest. And the fact that the Carnival is growing so quickly.
Some way of reducing entries will be needed at some point, from both an editing point of view and a reading one, too.
Russell
I like having a quality threshold. But I disagree that it discriminates against less well known bloggers. It surely discriminates against bloggers who (in the opinion of the host) are less *good* that week, not less well known.
Sorry, Mad Anthony, nothing personal. And if I had run this system, you would have got in that week.
But I can also see the argument for a well systemised blog, making stuff of interest easy to find. And maybe with the host highlighting his/her personal favourites at the top, for that serendipity that makes the Carnival so great.
Balanced against this though is the huge amount of extra work a host would need to invest. And the fact that the Carnival is growing so quickly.
Some way of reducing entries will be needed at some point, from both an editing point of view and a reading one, too.
Russell
Response from:
TJ
(04/14/05 4:44pm)
Thanks a lot for the active feedback! I appreciate this!
No doubt the majority of people has found it easier to cope with the 50+ entries instead of having the host preselecting the contents.
For me the value of blogs is often in the sorting people do for me and help me to find useful information fast.
However restricting the Carnival seems not what most people want to go for.
No doubt the majority of people has found it easier to cope with the 50+ entries instead of having the host preselecting the contents.
For me the value of blogs is often in the sorting people do for me and help me to find useful information fast.
However restricting the Carnival seems not what most people want to go for.
Subscribe
Use the search to look for other interesting posts
| RSS | See all blog subscribe options |
|
What is RSS? | |
| Yahoo! |
|
| Addthis |
|
| Bloglines |
|
| Newsletter | |
| Follow us on Twitter! |
















As you know, I love your blog and I have said so many times on my own blog, but this is a bad idea. It means that the Carnival becomes the collection of idiosyncratic choices of the host. Using categories and featured posts, as I did last week at Law & Entrepreneurship News, helps people to sort, but you are simply denying access to about 30 entries, which deprives the Carnival of some of its carnival-ness. This doesn't look innovative, it looks lazy.
Yes, and I am particularly peeved because my entry was omitted. If anyone is interested in reading about "Contracts and Corporations," check here
http://www.theconglomerate.org/2005/04/contracts_and_c.html">here
/>.